Home > Community > Forums > Logic Design > when and how to use set_clock_latency in RC

Share

  • Email
  • Social Web
* Required Fields

Recipients email * (separate multiple addresses with commas)

Your name *

Your email *

Message *

Contact Us

* Required Fields
First Name *

Last Name *

Email *

Company / Institution *

Comments: *

 when and how to use set_clock_latency in RC 

Last post Wed, Sep 3 2008 4:22 PM by BACKMAN. 0 replies.
Started by BACKMAN 03 Sep 2008 04:22 PM. Topic has 0 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (1 items)
Sort Posts:
  • Wed, Sep 3 2008 4:22 PM

    • BACKMAN
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on Wed, Sep 3 2008
    • Posts 1
    • Points 5
    when and how to use set_clock_latency in RC Reply

    I have some confusion about when and how to use set_clock_latency in RC. I have a clock which goes through the pad and some buffers and then hits the flop. And I have some inputs to and output from the flops.

     CLK  ---> PAD_CLK --->CLK_BUF/Q

     I define virtual clock "CLK_v" to time both I/O together with external delay and I define real clock "CLK" which roots at CLK_BUF/Q.

    Should I use set_clock_latency to take care of the delay due to PAD_CLK and CLK_BUF? If so, should I use -source with -early/-late or just use -min/-max. My understanding is that -soruce is only used for external clock insertion delay. For internal pad/buf delay, it's basically the same as network delay, hence I need to use -min/-max. However, when I use -min/-max, RC only uses the max value to timing the I2O, i.e., only use one corener "i.e., max". This is very different when I use -source where RC used  "-early" value for I2O. Is this expected?

    BTW, for delay value used in "early/late", I got it for the clock path using min/max lib seperately. 

    Or should I forget all this set_clock_latency business and directly define 'CLK' rooting at the CLK input port?

    Any suggetions? 

    • Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (1 items)
Sort Posts:
Started by BACKMAN at 03 Sep 2008 04:22 PM. Topic has 0 replies.